Didn't you say one had like 10 miles on it?

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Simon Westlake <si...@powercode.com> wrote:

>  And if anyone tells you about the three brand new Ferraris I just bought,
> they're lying. They were not brand new.
>
>
> On 03/09/2015 10:01 AM, Simon Westlake wrote:
>
> I think your tinfoil hat is a little tight.. ;) If we were going to use
> your billing server as a bitcoin miner, why would we only change the IPs
> when a customer updated their equipment in the portal? And why would we
> even make it visible? If I really wanted to hide a bitcoin miner on your
> billing server, I wouldn't do it by sending your customers to the redirect
> page..
>
> On 03/09/2015 09:57 AM, That One Guy wrote:
>
> me and my tinfoil hat find it suspiscious that v10 resolved the constant
> overloaded billing servers and this pops up, like there is a list somewhere
> and since the first one I saw was affiliated with bitcoins, Paranoid me
> assumed a developer sometime in the historical chain realized there were
> alot of unused cycles out there under their control.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Look up variable declaration types.  I'm willing to bet someone did the
>> math wrong.  I've seen it a couple times before but I can't recall where.
>>
>> While the IPs look random, they're not.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>  On Mar 9, 2015 10:47 AM, "That One Guy" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Where are these IPs coming from.
>>>
>>>  and this is a direct serious question, at any point in time, whether
>>> as a product of bertram or the previous developers, were billing servers
>>> used as a distributed bitcoin mining system?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Simon Westlake <si...@powercode.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  It's not database corruption, but it is a known bug (IP changing when
>>>> MAC is edited in customer portal) and it's fixed in 10.03.32. The patch
>>>> will be out this week.
>>>>
>>>> On 03/08/2015 10:34 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it seemed like a database corruption issue to me as well.  I had
>>>> one customer get the redirect and I went in and looked and he was on a
>>>> completely wrong IP (in a subnet that I happened to be working on earlier
>>>> that day and the evening before).  He hadn't even logged into the customer
>>>> portal.  The logs didn't show any IP change, but clearly his IP was changed
>>>> in the database, as he was working fine on the same IP for months and
>>>> months.  That issue and the incorrect assignments when a customer enters a
>>>> new MAC seemed related to me.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> *From:* Jay Fuller - Cyber Broadband Inc
>>>>> *To:* Powercode
>>>>> *Cc:* Cyber Broadband Inc.
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2015 7:34 PM
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Ticket Updated [Ticket Number:5841] - weird ip changes
>>>>> during customer portal equipment edits
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gentlemen:
>>>>>
>>>>> It has happened again.
>>>>>
>>>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxx, customer 1478, requested a public routable IP address
>>>>> which is
>>>>> in a different address class from what he was assigned at
>>>>> installation.
>>>>> Upon changing the address, he was assigned 104.152.40.91, which is an
>>>>> available address in the "Cullman Public" address range.  However,
>>>>> when
>>>>> looking at the ARP response (because the customer is bridged to our
>>>>> main
>>>>> router),  I saw another network device already had that IP address.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I searched for that MAC address, which was 78:24:AF:7B:49:38 ,
>>>>> using
>>>>> equipment search, which came back to customer
>>>>> 514, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, who had logged into the customer portal on
>>>>> January 29 to
>>>>> install a new router.  Upon changing his MAC address, powercode
>>>>> assigned him
>>>>> 104.153.191.25, which is not even in any of our network address ranges.
>>>>>
>>>>> It belongs to:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Source:  whois.arin.net
>>>>> IP Address:  104.153.191.25
>>>>> Name:  IMDC-KC-LOOPBACKS
>>>>> Handle:  NET-104-153-191-0-1
>>>>> Registration Date:  2/2/15
>>>>> Range:  104.153.191.0-104.153.191.31
>>>>> Org:  Iron Mountain Data Center
>>>>> Org Handle:  IMIML
>>>>> Address:  One Federal Street
>>>>> City:  Boston
>>>>> State/Province:  MA
>>>>> Postal Code:  02111
>>>>> Country:  UNITED STATES
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is very similar to our new public IP range which is
>>>>> 104.152.40.0/22
>>>>>
>>>>> Incidently, it appears this customer was assigned 104.152.40.91 before
>>>>> he
>>>>> attempted to edit his equipment and was changed to 104.153.191.25.
>>>>> Also of
>>>>> note, it appears this only affected the GUI/web interface of
>>>>> powercode, and
>>>>> the router/bmu continued to assign him 104.152.40.91.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will now have to reassign  xxxxxxxxx a new IP address since the
>>>>> web/gui
>>>>> gave his IP address to someone else.
>>>>> I hope this information helps you to figure out what is happening.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am still concerned we have some kind of database issue.  Weird
>>>>> things like
>>>>> this seem to be happening a lot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Powercode
>>>>> To: Cyber Broadband
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 2:15 PM
>>>>> Subject: Ticket Updated [Ticket Number:5841]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------- Please reply above this line ----------------
>>>>> Good afternoon Jay,
>>>>>
>>>>> We were able to test from this customer's account, and the same issue
>>>>> that
>>>>> was originally reported to us persisted. We logged into the customer
>>>>> portal,
>>>>> changed the MAC address by one digit, and immediately the customer was
>>>>> issued an IP address of 192.170.241.173. After changing the MAC
>>>>> address back
>>>>> to his current valid one, we then had to manually clear out his IP
>>>>> address
>>>>> in Powercode in order for the BMU to hand out a reservation for
>>>>> 192.168.3.36
>>>>> via DHCP.
>>>>>
>>>>> At this point, we are going to contact our network engineers for
>>>>> assistance
>>>>> in troubleshooting why this customer would receive a 192.170.xx.xx
>>>>> reservation, as this IP does not fit within any ranges defined in
>>>>> Powercode.
>>>>> We will update you as soon as we've had a chance to go over this with
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you visited our knowledge base? The Powercode knowledge base
>>>>> contains
>>>>> data on all aspects of Powercode, including the BMU. You may also find
>>>>> useful information on our community forum.
>>>>> We endeavor to respond to all tickets within two business days. Our
>>>>> business
>>>>> hours are Monday - Friday, 9AM to 5PM Central time. Please contact us
>>>>> via
>>>>> telephone at (920) 351-1010 <%28920%29%20351-1010> or via Skype at
>>>>> powercode_support with any
>>>>> urgent needs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> John Mahnke
>>>>>
>>>>> Powercode - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
>>>>> powercode.com
>>>>> P: 920-351-1010
>>>>> E: supp...@powercode.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> *From:* Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>  *Sent:* Sunday, March 08, 2015 9:25 PM
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Powercode oddity - Commerzbank Ip space
>>>>>
>>>>>  I also have a ticket in about this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is known to them? (powercode)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:00 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
>>>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, they're aware of it.  i pointed this out to them weeks ago.  :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> *From:* That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 08, 2015 2:06 PM
>>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Powercode oddity - Commerzbank Ip space
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I am able to replicate a small issue we are having, trying to make
>>>>>>> the decision of whether it looks like a security issue or just a bug.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Through powercode, there are two ways to update equipment, through
>>>>>>> our interface, where we select all the details and through the customer
>>>>>>> portal where all the customers can do is update their MAC address.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  no problems with our end.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  However, when a customer updates their MAC address, it is
>>>>>>> assigning IP space that apparently belongs to this Commerzbank IP
>>>>>>> space 208.74.54.100 and 208.74.54.99.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  This IP space is absolutely not in our system, and wouldnt route
>>>>>>> naturally on our network
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Net Range 208.74.52.0 - 208.74.55.255  CIDR 208.74.52.0/22
>>>>>>>   Name DKIB-USA  Handle NET-208-74-52-0-1  Parent NET208 (
>>>>>>> NET-208-0-0-0-0
>>>>>>> <http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-208-0-0-0-0.html>)  Net Type Direct
>>>>>>> Assignment  Origin AS
>>>>>>>   Organization Commerzbank AG (COMMER-109
>>>>>>> <http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/COMMER-109.html>)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  My initial thoughts are this is some bug in powercode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Paranoid me is that our system is somehow compromised and
>>>>>>> rerouting illegitimate traffic somehow. Customer is down, so not through
>>>>>>> them. but something like TOR rerouting or some other magician script for
>>>>>>> the axis of evil.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Anybody have any ideas on this? I am debating taking our billing
>>>>>>> server offline, but would hate to take such an extreme measure for what
>>>>>>> could amount to nothing more than a fat finger from a programmer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the 
>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the 
>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon Westlake
>>>> Powercode - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
>>>> powercode.com
>>>> P: 920-351-1010
>>>>  E: si...@powercode.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>
>
>  --
>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
> --
> Simon Westlake
> Powercode - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
> powercode.com
> P: 920-351-1010
> E: si...@powercode.com
>
>
> --
> Simon Westlake
> Powercode - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
> powercode.com
> P: 920-351-1010
> E: si...@powercode.com
>

Reply via email to