I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs done
in the next couple weeks.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units.
>
> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. The
> PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in airprism
> between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp or ptmp, as
> far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation.
>
> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are going
> to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy features
> like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this point is the
> lack of DFS and UNII-1.
>
> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this point
> unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should perform best
> of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this point. I
> expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way.
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
>> connectorized units?
>>
>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
>>
>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>
>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already have
>> it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I
>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what
>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this
>> two things that are going to converge?
>>
>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there
>> any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance?
>> (future demand is a factor as well)
>>
>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three products
>> there?
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to