No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized > > I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual > hands yet is it? > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs >>> done in the next couple weeks. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>> >>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. >>>> The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in >>>> airprism between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp or >>>> ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation. >>>> >>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this >>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>> >>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should perform >>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this point. >>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>> connectorized units? >>>>> >>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>> >>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>> >>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. >>>>> I >>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what >>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>>> >>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there >>>>> any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance? >>>>> (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>> >>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>> products there? >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
