I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat" out of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last 15 > years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!! > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable >> value. That has to be a first. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey, who says they are accurate?? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>>>>> >>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >>>>>>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >>>>>>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will always >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>>>>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
