That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-) You can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if they were going "on the boat" ;)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the boat" out > of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > >> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the last 15 >> years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!! >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a quantifiable >>> value. That has to be a first. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, who says they are accurate?? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>> well go >>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will always >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they >>>>>>>>>> are going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some >>>>>>>>>> spiffy >>>>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot >>>>>>>>>>> HP >>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>>>> ptp and >>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
