Try this chart. On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also have > checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. And what > power they take. > > *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> > *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line > > Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the AC > line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). > > NanoBeam = all integrated > PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design > > It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different > areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as > popular in other parts of the world). > > Would chart help? > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases need >> better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, >> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a >> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and >> the other by antenna size in mm. >> >> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s crazy >> small? >> >> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >> >> My head hurts. >> >> >> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >> >> Here you go: >> >> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >> >> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and PTMP >> performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason to. The >> cost is same either way... >> >> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>> connectorized units? >>> >>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>> >>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>> >>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I >>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what >>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>> two things that are going to converge? >>> >>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there >>> any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance? >>> (future demand is a factor as well) >>> >>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three products >>> there? >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > >
