Oops let's try again. How about this chart... ubnt radio comparison <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
-Ty On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Try this chart. > On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also have >> checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. And what >> power they take. >> >> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >> >> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the AC >> line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). >> >> NanoBeam = all integrated >> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >> >> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different >> areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as >> popular in other parts of the world). >> >> Would chart help? >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases need >>> better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, >>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a >>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and >>> the other by antenna size in mm. >>> >>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s crazy >>> small? >>> >>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>> >>> My head hurts. >>> >>> >>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>> >>> Here you go: >>> >>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>> >>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and >>> PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason >>> to. The cost is same either way... >>> >>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>> connectorized units? >>>> >>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>> >>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>> >>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I >>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what >>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>> >>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there >>>> any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance? >>>> (future demand is a factor as well) >>>> >>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>> products there? >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
