If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced the
AF5x.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote:
> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port.
>
> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The data
>> sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE injector.
>> That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. Anyone have
>> one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If they're
>> running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 watts.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>
>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list
>> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it
>> based on input from the community.
>>
>> -Ty
>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!?
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
>>> ubnt radio comparison
>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
>>>
>>> -Ty
>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Try this chart.
>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also
>>>>> have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for.
>>>>> And
>>>>> what power they take.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the
>>>>> AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes).
>>>>>
>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated
>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different
>>>>> areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as
>>>>> popular in other parts of the world).
>>>>>
>>>>> Would chart help?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases
>>>>>> need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC,
>>>>>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a
>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and
>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s
>>>>>> crazy small?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My head hurts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here you go:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism
>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and
>>>>>> PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason
>>>>>> to. The cost is same either way...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
>>>>>>> connectorized units?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already
>>>>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP
>>>>>>> parabolics. I
>>>>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats
>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this
>>>>>>> two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of
>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
>>>>>>> products there?
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the
>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
