Hot damn! Who made that?!?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:
Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
ubnt radio comparison
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
-Ty
On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com
<mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Try this chart.
On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would
also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently
approved for. And what power they take.
*From:* Ben Moore <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in
the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple
sizes).
NanoBeam = all integrated
PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for
different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very
popular here and not as popular in other parts of the world).
Would chart help?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some
cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam,
PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t
understand the difference between a NanoBeam and a
PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and
the other by antenna size in mm.
And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco?
Because it’s crazy small?
Then there’s the M vs W thing.
My head hurts.
*From:* Ben Moore <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
Here you go:
Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
PTP - PTP only, airPrism
PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
These are split due to the filtering used for each
(maximize PTP and PTMP performance). We won't split
unless there is a performance reason to. The cost is same
either way...
How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these
are the only connectorized units?
What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp
airprism only?
Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo
link, we already have it connected to one pol of a set
of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I figure its worth
checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats
what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of
ptp and ptmp or is this two things that are going to
converge?
Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput
demand link is there any major benefit of going to the
AC over the M5 in terms of performance? (future demand
is a factor as well)
Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between
the three products there?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your team as part of yourself you have
already failed as part of the team.
