Or, ya know, somebody might have asked for it, and wanted to buy a million units, and already had 24V at their remote small cell cabinets, or something like that. The description does say carrier backhaul radio, maybe that’s a hint.
WISPs in the US are one market for Ubiquiti, not the only market. It’s possible this decision makes great sense and the reason isn’t apparent from our/your perspective. From: Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:03 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line 24v... because UBNT must do something to fuck up a product. Just use 48v on everything! First three products use essentially 48v... . than let's do a 24... because! ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:18:57 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 watts. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it based on input from the community. -Ty On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: Hot damn! Who made that?!? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: Oops let's try again. How about this chart... ubnt radio comparison -Ty On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: Try this chart. On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. And what power they take. From: Ben Moore Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). NanoBeam = all integrated PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as popular in other parts of the world). Would chart help? On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and the other by antenna size in mm. And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s crazy small? Then there’s the M vs W thing. My head hurts. From: Ben Moore Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line Here you go: Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP PTP - PTP only, airPrism PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason to. The cost is same either way... How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only connectorized units? What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? Are some of these shipping without all there guts? I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance? (future demand is a factor as well) Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three products there? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
