I think 24vdc is used way more than 48v in the WISP industry unless you get into licensed paths.
Erich Kaiser North Central Tower er...@northcentraltower.com Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > 24v... because UBNT must do something to fuck up a product. Just use 48v > on everything! First three products use essentially 48v... . than let's do > a 24... because! > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:18:57 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line > > I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The data > sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE injector. > That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. Anyone have > one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If they're > running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 watts. > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > > I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list > awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it > based on input from the community. > > -Ty > On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >> >> Oops let's try again. How about this chart... >> ubnt radio comparison >> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >> >> -Ty >> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Try this chart. >>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also >>>> have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. And >>>> what power they take. >>>> >>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>> >>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the AC >>>> line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). >>>> >>>> NanoBeam = all integrated >>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >>>> >>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different >>>> areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as >>>> popular in other parts of the world). >>>> >>>> Would chart help? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases >>>>> need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, >>>>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a >>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and >>>>> the other by antenna size in mm. >>>>> >>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s >>>>> crazy small? >>>>> >>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>>>> >>>>> My head hurts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>> >>>>> Here you go: >>>>> >>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>>>> >>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and >>>>> PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason >>>>> to. The cost is same either way... >>>>> >>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>> >>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>> >>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>> >>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>> parabolics. I >>>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what >>>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>>>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>> >>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>> products there? >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>> team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
