Lets mail pitchforks to UBNT headquarters and see what gets where first. ryan
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 16:07, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > > 10 business days? :) > >> On 03/30/2015 03:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 days. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and >>> pitchforks? >>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>>>> >>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual >>>>> hands yet is it? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >>>>>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >>>>>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman >>>>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs >>>>>>> done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 >>>>>>> PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. >>>>>>>> The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in >>>>>>>> airprism between the two which means they will always be limited to >>>>>>>> ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent >>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>>>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>> this point is >>>>>>>> the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>>>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should >>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility >>>>>>>> at this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every >>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy >>>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of >>>>>>>>> the rocket AC line, these are the only connectorized >>>>>>>>> units? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>>>>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>> dont know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>> ptp and ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> >
