at US distributors On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> Arrives where? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 30, 2015 8:30 PM, "Ben Moore" <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > >> Guys - >> >> One shipment arrives tomorrow and one on Thursday... >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> Well they kept saying they're better at having stock. Several of them >>> said March. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Mar 30, 2015 8:23 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> You didn't really think that number would be accurate, did you? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 >>>>> days. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and >>>>>> pitchforks? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not >>>>>>>> connectorized >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>>> well go >>>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will >>>>>>>>>>> always be >>>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they >>>>>>>>>>> are going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some >>>>>>>>>>> spiffy >>>>>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more >>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at >>>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every >>>>>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot >>>>>>>>>>>> HP >>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and >>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link >>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
