Well they kept saying they're better at having stock. Several of them said March.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 30, 2015 8:23 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > You didn't really think that number would be accurate, did you? > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 days. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and >>> pitchforks? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>> >>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>>>> >>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual >>>>> hands yet is it? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >>>>>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >>>>>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will always be >>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>>>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this >>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>>>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should >>>>>>>> perform >>>>>>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this >>>>>>>> point. >>>>>>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
