That's like wondering which direction the sun will come up in the morning...
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Ryan Spott <rsp...@irongoat.net> wrote: > Lets mail pitchforks to UBNT headquarters and see what gets where first. > > ryan > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 16:07, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > > 10 business days? :) > > On 03/30/2015 03:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 days. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and >> pitchforks? >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>>> >>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >>>>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >>>>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will always be >>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent >>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this >>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should >>>>>>> perform >>>>>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this >>>>>>> point. >>>>>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont >>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
