As per the latest tracking they arrive tomorrow and Thursday. On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote:
> at US distributors > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> Arrives where? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Mar 30, 2015 8:30 PM, "Ben Moore" <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> >>> Guys - >>> >>> One shipment arrives tomorrow and one on Thursday... >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Well they kept saying they're better at having stock. Several of them >>>> said March. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Mar 30, 2015 8:23 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You didn't really think that number would be accurate, did you? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 >>>>>> days. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and >>>>>>> pitchforks? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not >>>>>>>>> connectorized >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>>>> well go >>>>>>>>>> all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard < >>>>>>>>>>> mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will >>>>>>>>>>>> always be >>>>>>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a >>>>>>>>>>>> permanent >>>>>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they >>>>>>>>>>>> are going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some >>>>>>>>>>>> spiffy >>>>>>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more >>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at >>>>>>>>>>>> this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every >>>>>>>>>>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> foot HP >>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont >>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and >>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link >>>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in >>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of >>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the >>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there? >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
