Sorry, I read your question wrong. You can disregard my last message.
What is the network type on the interfaces? I use "point-to-point" for
/30's. Both sides need to be set to that way for that type to work
properly. You may wish to try changing the type. The backup and
designated router I believe are status statements for OSPF broadcast.
Gilbert
On 5/20/2015 1:34 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I know I've put at least three /30s on the same interface and I don't
remember running into problems. When you're running OSPF on a /30 one
router will always be the designated router and the other will be the
backup - I don't think it normally matters which router has which
role, but you can make it prefer one of the other by setting the
interface priority.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So I have this here mikrotik Ive been implementing ospf on
Right now because this is transition, all MT ports hit the same switch
Eth6 is on a /30 that is going to a powercode BMU thats
distributing the default route, it works fine
Eth2 is on a /30 that is going to a fortigate, it works fine
the routes propagate as they should
I initially tried to add another /30 to Eth2 for a second
fortigate, but it wouldnt let me add the netwok
so I put that /30 on eth3 it comes up in a state designated router
I moved it to eth4, same thing designated router the other two
that are working have said backup all along
is there something about adding a third ospf interface to mikrotik
i need to know here?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
