3 hours i had a 2 where a 1 should be On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Gilbert Gutierrez < [email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, I read your question wrong. You can disregard my last message. > > What is the network type on the interfaces? I use "point-to-point" for > /30's. Both sides need to be set to that way for that type to work > properly. You may wish to try changing the type. The backup and designated > router I believe are status statements for OSPF broadcast. > > Gilbert > > On 5/20/2015 1:34 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > I know I've put at least three /30s on the same interface and I don't > remember running into problems. When you're running OSPF on a /30 one > router will always be the designated router and the other will be the > backup - I don't think it normally matters which router has which role, but > you can make it prefer one of the other by setting the interface priority. > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> So I have this here mikrotik Ive been implementing ospf on >> Right now because this is transition, all MT ports hit the same switch >> Eth6 is on a /30 that is going to a powercode BMU thats distributing the >> default route, it works fine >> Eth2 is on a /30 that is going to a fortigate, it works fine >> >> the routes propagate as they should >> >> I initially tried to add another /30 to Eth2 for a second fortigate, >> but it wouldnt let me add the netwok >> so I put that /30 on eth3 it comes up in a state designated router >> >> I moved it to eth4, same thing designated router the other two that are >> working have said backup all along >> >> is there something about adding a third ospf interface to mikrotik i >> need to know here? >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
