Looked twice at this. How does your network know the route to a network connected to one of your routers if he does not redistribute this information into ospf?
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Dennis Burgess Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 14:10 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question There are about 0 times when you should distribute connected, just a FYI. 99% of the time it causes issues with unintended and/or unneeded distribution of routes .. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net <mailto:den...@linktechs.net> – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gilbert Gutierrez Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:47 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question Are you redistributing Connected? If the /30 is not on the networks tab, then you will need to redistribute connected routes. If you add static routes pointing to places you will want to redistribute static routes as well. Gilbert On 5/20/2015 1:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: So I have this here mikrotik Ive been implementing ospf on Right now because this is transition, all MT ports hit the same switch Eth6 is on a /30 that is going to a powercode BMU thats distributing the default route, it works fine Eth2 is on a /30 that is going to a fortigate, it works fine the routes propagate as they should I initially tried to add another /30 to Eth2 for a second fortigate, but it wouldnt let me add the netwok so I put that /30 on eth3 it comes up in a state designated router I moved it to eth4, same thing designated router the other two that are working have said backup all along is there something about adding a third ospf interface to mikrotik i need to know here? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
