Chuck, Can you tell us what vendors are working for you? I know you have said you have tried a few.
> On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote: > > The more PON we do, the more I like it. > > Regards, > Chuck > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net > <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote: > PON to the desktop would only have active gear in the NOC and in the device. > Everything between is passive. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:16:36 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why? > > > But Why? I understand Long haul PON for FTTH, to conserve miles and miles of > trunk fiber, but why in a building? Instead of having a single device (a > switch) you now have active hardware all over the building to manage and > maintain (And power). > > > On 6/23/2015 10:08 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > PON looks to be where people are going for fiber to the desktop. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com> > To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:49:14 AM > Subject: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why? > > We just had a new public library built here in town. The entire LAN > infrastructure is built on PON using the Tellabs ONT's. > http://www01.tellabs.com/products/tellabs1100ont.shtml > <http://www01.tellabs.com/products/tellabs1100ont.shtml> I've briefly > looked around their site, and read some case studies, but Why would you > choose PON infrastructure in a single building? From what I can tell, > you still have to run CAT 5 to the ONT for power, and the 4 port units > (which I saw several around the library) have a wall-wort and a power > switch. I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the concept, other > than someone make a slick presentation, and someone else got a nice > payoff. I wouldn't be surprised of the Latter, every single 120v outlet > in the building is a 20A duplex receptacle with USB Ports (~$30 each) > > > > > >
