I think Calix has come down over time.  

From: Cassidy B. Larson 
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?

Are you scared of vendor lock-in with PON?  That’s what scares me.  Calix 
jacking up their rates without any recourse but swapping equipment on both 
sides.  


  On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:08 AM, KevinR <gol...@genevaonline.com> wrote:

  Chuck, 

  Can you tell us what vendors are working for you?
  I know you have said you have tried a few.





    On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:

    The more PON we do, the more I like it.

    Regards,
    Chuck

    On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

      PON to the desktop would only have active gear in the NOC and in the 
device. Everything between is passive.




      -----
      Mike Hammett
      Intelligent Computing Solutions
      http://www.ics-il.com



      Midwest Internet Exchange
      http://www.midwest-ix.com




--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com>
      To: af@afmug.com
      Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:16:36 AM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why? 


      But Why?  I understand Long haul PON for FTTH, to conserve miles and 
miles of trunk fiber, but why in a building?  Instead of having a single device 
(a switch) you now have active hardware all over the building to manage and 
maintain (And power).  



      On 6/23/2015 10:08 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

        PON looks to be where people are going for fiber to the desktop.




        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions
        http://www.ics-il.com



        Midwest Internet Exchange
        http://www.midwest-ix.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: "Nate Burke" mailto:n...@blastcomm.com
        To: "Animal Farm" mailto:af@afmug.com
        Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:49:14 AM
        Subject: [AFMUG] Indoor GPON - Why?

        We just had a new public library built here in town.  The entire LAN 
        infrastructure is built on PON using the Tellabs ONT's. 
        http://www01.tellabs.com/products/tellabs1100ont.shtml  I've briefly 
        looked around their site, and read some case studies, but Why would you 
        choose PON infrastructure in a single building?  From what I can tell, 
        you still have to run CAT 5 to the ONT for power, and the 4 port units 
        (which I saw several around the library) have a wall-wort and a power 
        switch.  I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the concept, other 
        than someone make a slick presentation, and someone else got a nice 
        payoff.  I wouldn't be surprised of the Latter, every single 120v 
outlet 
        in the building is a 20A duplex receptacle with USB Ports (~$30 each)









Reply via email to