I read it as using the ePMP for queuing, the performance is less than expected. 
Using the MT for queuing, the performance is as expected. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:57:18 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp user throughput 


If the Mikrotiks at the customer site are doing 40x10 but the customer devices 
behind the MT it doesn't really make sense to look at the epmp for your 
problem. 


It could be the Mikrotik's CPU, port, wireless or the customer device. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Nate Burke < n...@blastcomm.com > wrote: 


I have deployed quite a bit of epmp, but most people are at my base package, 
4x1 (using the radio qos to limit bw on different tiers). Of the handful of 
people that are on larger plans, 20x5 or 40x10, 2 of them, on different towers 
are complaining that they struggle to get over 10mb on a speed test. The radio 
rf link test performs at the assigned qos level, and I sent one of them a 
mikrotik to go between the poe and his router (qos 40x10), and udp/tcp tests to 
that are coming back as expected. However, I can be watching the router, and 
his interface plugged directly into a laptop only runs like 10x2 during a 
speedtest. Do both of these customers have something wonky with their laptops, 
or is there a setting in epmp I'm overlooking? Most of our epmp deployment has 
been FSK upgrades, so I haven't had much actual laptop time myself behind an 
epmp sm, as we just go on the roof and change radios. 

Nate 



Reply via email to