It could be a laptop issue, one time someone made fun of my laptop so I went out and bought an i7 laptop and now I can run speedtests all day long with no problem...
Erich Kaiser North Central Tower er...@northcentraltower.com Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > I'm not doing any MT Queuing, the Only Queue is the EPMP QOS. I put a MT > in Bridge mode at one of the customer locations for bandwidth testing after > the customer was complaining about slow speeds. The MT BW Test to that > Bridge runs as expected. It's reassuring that others are not seeing this. > > > On 7/22/2015 5:43 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > Also, the two tests may be different. Speedtest.net type test may be > saying I see packet loss starting at X Mbps so the rate is X, while iPerf > type test may say I see Y Mbps goodput despite some packet loss so the rate > is Y. > > This may be interacting with the queuing method, as Mike points out. > > Perhaps set the ePMP to wide open and see if customer results change, then > set queue in Miktrotik and see what happens. > > > *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:30 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Epmp user throughput > > I read it as using the ePMP for queuing, the performance is less than > expected. Using the MT for queuing, the performance is as expected. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:57:18 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Epmp user throughput > > If the Mikrotiks at the customer site are doing 40x10 but the customer > devices behind the MT it doesn't really make sense to look at the epmp for > your problem. > > It could be the Mikrotik's CPU, port, wireless or the customer device. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > >> I have deployed quite a bit of epmp, but most people are at my base >> package, 4x1 (using the radio qos to limit bw on different tiers). Of the >> handful of people that are on larger plans, 20x5 or 40x10, 2 of them, on >> different towers are complaining that they struggle to get over 10mb on a >> speed test. The radio rf link test performs at the assigned qos level, and >> I sent one of them a mikrotik to go between the poe and his router (qos >> 40x10), and udp/tcp tests to that are coming back as expected. However, I >> can be watching the router, and his interface plugged directly into a >> laptop only runs like 10x2 during a speedtest. Do both of these customers >> have something wonky with their laptops, or is there a setting in epmp I'm >> overlooking? Most of our epmp deployment has been FSK upgrades, so I >> haven't had much actual laptop time myself behind an epmp sm, as we just go >> on the roof and change radios. >> >> Nate > > > > > >
