That’s what I am saying even though I had not said it yet.
Best regards, Brandon Yuchasz GogebicRange.net www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 7:48 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux product design. So, what I'm hearing you say is that you just want to buy a whole bunch of 12 port injectors and standardize on that? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: I'd rather but a dozen 12 ports than 6 of one and 6 of another. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 11, 2016 8:38 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com> wrote: Based on current plans, the rackmount version is going to be available in either 4, 8, 12 or 16 port versions or 6, 12 or 18 port versions, depending on whether I end up with 4 or 6 ports per 'chunk'.....all of these will be upwardly expandable. So I think that handles pretty much anyone who wants a rackmounted unit. Hopefully this will make everyone who wants one happy. On the 'smaller units', I of course have the 4 today. Mechanically 12 ports fit into the same space as two of the 4 port units, since I only need one set of input and output jacks for the injector, so that's why I'm thinking that way. I could go to 8 instead, but that opens up a whole can of worms (as an example, just shrinking the case triggers the potential need for a different din rail mounting kit). It sounds like 4 is too few and 12 is fine, although 8 would probably work for many, if not most sites. Is that fair? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: In spite of the handful of those that might want a 16 or 18 port injector, I think you & packetflux would do better with a 12 port; or maybe even an 8 port. We have only one POP that would need the higher count. If you made a 16 or 18 port version, I would think rackmount only. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/11/2016 1:22 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: So, I have in the fairly immediate future the new "universal" 4 port injector (in the same form factor as the existing syncinjectors).... And the rackmount unit is progressing well, so that's coming as well - up to 16 or 18 ports per 1U And then we have the item the question is about. I intended to build a 12 port unit in a double height din rail mountable enclosure. If you think about gluing two syncinjectors on top of each other and having 12 ports instead of 8 in that same space - that's what I'm talking about. I'm wondering how many people would use this last product. My thought would be that once you get to more than a handful of radios at a site, you're probably going to end up wanting the rackmount solution.... Using two syncinjectors will get you to 8 radios in the same space as this proposed device, at 2/3 of the cost of the proposed device. How many of you would be using more than 8 radios at a site that you wouldn't just move to a rackmount unit? -- Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce> -- Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 <mailto:forre...@imach.com> forre...@imach.com | <http://www.packetflux.com/> http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce> -- Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 <mailto:forre...@imach.com> forre...@imach.com | <http://www.packetflux.com/> http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce>
