Exactly. One box to rule them all. I know what all sites use. Right now I have POE injector, gig POE injector, and gig sync injector. We have the technology to make one universal product.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 12, 2016 12:16 AM, "Brandon Yuchasz" <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote: > That’s what I am saying even though I had not said it yet. > > > > Best regards, > > Brandon Yuchasz > > GogebicRange.net > > www.gogebicrange.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian > (List Account) > *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 7:48 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] One more quick question in re: new packetflux > product design. > > > > So, what I'm hearing you say is that you just want to buy a whole bunch of > 12 port injectors and standardize on that? > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > I'd rather but a dozen 12 ports than 6 of one and 6 of another. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mar 11, 2016 8:38 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < > li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > > Based on current plans, the rackmount version is going to be available in > either 4, 8, 12 or 16 port versions or 6, 12 or 18 port versions, depending > on whether I end up with 4 or 6 ports per 'chunk'.....all of these will be > upwardly expandable. > > So I think that handles pretty much anyone who wants a rackmounted unit. > Hopefully this will make everyone who wants one happy. > > On the 'smaller units', I of course have the 4 today. Mechanically 12 > ports fit into the same space as two of the 4 port units, since I only need > one set of input and output jacks for the injector, so that's why I'm > thinking that way. I could go to 8 instead, but that opens up a whole can > of worms (as an example, just shrinking the case triggers the potential > need for a different din rail mounting kit). > > It sounds like 4 is too few and 12 is fine, although 8 would probably work > for many, if not most sites. Is that fair? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In spite of the handful of those that might want a 16 or 18 port injector, > I think you & packetflux would do better with a 12 port; or maybe even an 8 > port. We have only one POP that would need the higher count. > > If you made a 16 or 18 port version, I would think rackmount only. > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 3/11/2016 1:22 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > So, I have in the fairly immediate future the new "universal" 4 port > injector (in the same form factor as the existing syncinjectors).... > > And the rackmount unit is progressing well, so that's coming as well - up > to 16 or 18 ports per 1U > > And then we have the item the question is about. > > I intended to build a 12 port unit in a double height din rail mountable > enclosure. If you think about gluing two syncinjectors on top of each > other and having 12 ports instead of 8 in that same space - that's what I'm > talking about. > > I'm wondering how many people would use this last product. My thought > would be that once you get to more than a handful of radios at a site, > you're probably going to end up wanting the rackmount solution.... > > Using two syncinjectors will get you to 8 radios in the same space as this > proposed device, at 2/3 of the cost of the proposed device. > > How many of you would be using more than 8 radios at a site that you > wouldn't just move to a rackmount unit? > > > -- > > *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > > forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com > > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > > > > > > > -- > > *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > > forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com > > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > > > > > -- > > *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > > forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com > > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > >
