Actually only 3% of their budget goes to abortion. On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016, 5:02 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > >> His stances: >> Gay marriage is wrong >> > I agree, but I think it should be allowed since it is a function of > government and I don't want government making choices concerning religion. > >> He doesn't support adoption for a gay couple >> > Neither do I. Another religious based issue. But I have no issue with it > if done by government since I don't want them making decisions based on > religious reasons. > >> Defund planned parenthood >> > I would agree since most of their budget goes to abortion. Abortion is the > law of the land period, that doesn't mean I want to pay for it. > >> Raising corporate tax is bad >> > The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates. Besides, don't you know > that corporations really don't pay taxes. It may make you feel better to > tax them, but alon costs are passed on to consumers. > >> Voted yes for more sentencing and prosecution for juveniles. >> > And your solution to the the issue of juvenile crime is what? I don't have > an answer but this is a pretty common one. > >> Wants to drill in ANWR >> > Yea > >> Voted no on tax credits for renewable energy. >> > Wind farms are a scam. Nuclear is a much more efficient solution. > >> Voted no on 4 weeks paid parental leave for federal employees. >> > Finally, someone says no to the codeled federal employees who already get > to much for to little work. > >> Votes for PATRIOT act over and over >> > No arguement with your issue there. > >> Voted to allow warantless electronic surveillance against us citizens >> > If we are talking about meets data in phone calls I agree with it. Very > helpful after an event to find out to whom one has been talking. > >> Denied additional funding that would provide expanded child healthcare >> > With what else attached? > >> "Let's build a fence!" >> > Let's build something > >> Voted NO on reporting / deporting illegal immigrants who received >> hospital treatment >> > Huh... Interesting > >> Etc. A few things I like him on, but mostly he's a "nope" for me. >> > > Much of what you have an issues with are religious issues. Or at least > they are for me. We can disagree, but like most, I am unlikely to change my > deeply held religious beliefs. > >> On Mar 13, 2016 4:46 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey, I said I liked him. Just not full on man crush. >>> >>> I didn’t see how his math added up for the budgets he proposed. There >>> were some missing pages where magic happened to balance the budget. Seemed >>> like the same old voodoo economics. >>> >>> So “man crush”, is that like Trump and Putin? At least Putin is >>> supposedly an 8th degree black belt. He would probably take care of the >>> protester himself. If Trump thinks he can bully the Putins of the world, >>> I’m not so sure. I think McCain could take him in a fair fight. Hell, >>> Bernie could probably take him. I was never fond of Nixon, but the photo >>> of the “kitchen debate” with Khrushchev is a treasure. >>> http://spectator.org/articles/41740/how-handle-bully-nixon-vs-khrushchev >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net> >>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 13, 2016 4:19 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Paul Ryan >>> >>> >>> I have actually followed Paul Ryan since the first time he appeared on >>> the national stage. Very impressed with him. Could almost call him my >>> "man crush". I'd be interested in hearing what you do not like about him >>> Ken. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 13, 2016 2:04 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump's Supporters Love Him Even More >>> AfterChicago Violence >>> >>> I think the "establishment" is missing why people are fed up with them, >>> I'm >>> not convinced it's about left or right. If I had to single out one >>> person >>> as the poster boy for why the establishment has failed us, it would be >>> Mitch >>> McConnell. All 4 leaders in Congress have only been worried about their >>> own >>> power and re-election, but McConnell is the worst of a bad bunch. >>> >>> I don't agree with Paul Ryan's economics or some of his politics, but I >>> like >>> what he has said since being elected Speaker. I would like to see if >>> they >>> are just words, or if he would translate them into actions. I don't >>> think >>> we will get to find out, election politics seem to have rendered him >>> irrelevant. And Mitch the Turtle would have to be replaced with someone >>> actually interested in governing. I wonder what conservative goals >>> could >>> have been accomplished in the 7 years Mitch has spent trying to make >>> Obama >>> fail no matter how much damage it causes. Tort reform? Modifications >>> to >>> Obamacare? Fix sequestration? Tax reform? Immigration reform? Mitch >>> doesn't care. Mitch cares about Mitch. That's the problem with the >>> establishment, they spend all their effort on getting elected and >>> staying in >>> power, they don't even pretend to do their job. And let me be clear, >>> I'm >>> not saying Pelosi, Reid and Boehner were much better, it's just >>> McConnell is >>> the most blatant hack of the bunch, every time I see him on TV I feel he >>> is >>> giving me the finger. >>> >>> I am probably fooling myself that Paul Ryan would be different, but I >>> don't >>> think we'll find out. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Bill Prince >>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 1:40 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump's Supporters Love Him Even More >>> After >>> Chicago Violence >>> >>> IMO, Obama moved right, and the Republicans moved further to the right. >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 3/13/2016 6:01 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote: >>> > Obama moved right as much as the Republicans moved left. Everybody's >>> idea >>> > of compromise these days is you come to where I am and I'll make a >>> deal. >>> >>>
