Hey, i tried to do that just the other day! :P I figured with all of
the stuff going on, appending tags in the title is probably the best
way to help people auto-filter.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote:
> Been hitting mass delete a TON lately.  I was going to suggest that anything
> political gets prepended with POLITICAL:  simply to make it super easy to
> delete the “stuff”.  But, that’s just my opinion and not my list.
>
>
>
> Paul J
>
>
>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:58 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Politics on the list
>
>
>
> I think you guys would be amazed by a Canadian federal election.
>
> There's usually 2-3 months of lead up time to a vote being called, in which
> the political parties get all their stuff organized and ready just in case.
>
> Then the actual election/campaign period goes for between 25 to 45 days,
> maximum. Then there's a vote, and we have a new government.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It seems politics is consuming a lot of chatter on the list. I personally
> enjoy it, I have thick skin, per another thread, but I am concerned it could
> turn south. This is the only industry mechanism I have for quick and dirty
> advice so I am fearful it could devolve into something ugly or useless like
> dslreports.
> When Chuck ran the list there was a bit more policing, stay away from
> religion or politics. I assume others got the offlist spankings I got. I'm
> not bashing the current list owner, I enjoy the occasional freedom to rant.
> What I am fearful of is losing the best resource I have for a vendor neutral
> discussion of on topic issues.
>
> I'm not asking that the off topic political discussion stop, or any other
> off topic discussion for that matter, I do request however that everybody
> come to a consensus that we are all adults with different backgrounds and
> opinions who can disagree and still work together effectively.
> This is solely a self serving request as I an very much incompetent for my
> position and rely heavily on advice from this list to impress my boss so he
> continues to give me a paycheck he could probably pay a comatose midget who
> only wakes up long enough to swear to do the same level of work.
>
>

Reply via email to