"If" you can get the telnet password for you model Gemtek CPE. You can run CBE::showMacStatsRx (Wimax world for instance: WISX-167)
On 4/14/16, 12:05 PM, "Af on behalf of Adam Moffett" <af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >Are we talking about LTE or Wimax? > >Of the 4 Wimax systems I've used, the Compact is probably the worst. >I'm assured that all of my problems are fixed when we upgrade to LTE. > >I'm not sure I trust the opinions on LTE. People are very focused on >the NLOS performance, and they are still experiencing the "wow" factor >of getting a connection working in a weird place that seems like it >shouldn't work. I haven't seen much conversation about whether the >connection you get is something supportable. Wimax always had the >problem that if the customer tells you something is wrong you have a >hard time proving whether there is or isn't a problem without going on >site. I don't know if LTE on the compact really changes that >situation. I do know the Gemtek CPE still has no damn ethernet stats. > >In LTE the AP can use a 20mhz channel at 64QAM and get close to a >hundred meg aggregate on that. You can pay a license fee for dual >carrier mode and use 2 x 20mhz channels to double that. With MU-MIMO at >some future date they expect to double that. So best case is 400meg (I >believe). Since using 40mhz might not be practical, divide that by what >you can actually use. > >They do have a capacity planning spreadsheet if you can get in touch >with someone who has it. > > > >On 4/13/2016 1:08 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: >> >> Sorry for the on topic content. >> >> Would those of you here who have played enough with the telrad gear >> please explain to me the realities of things like capacity per >> ap/channel/mhz, distance capability (ie link budget), and the like? >> Ie what should really be on a spec sheet. >> >> I'm still trying to dig through the marketing spin to understand the >> real capabilities of these units. >> >
