No, I cant add any topology changes or try to bring in unfamiliar things like ibgp or mpls/vpls while bringing in something unfamiliar like BGP unless I run out of interim options
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, can...@believewireless.net < p...@believewireless.net> wrote: > With Mikrotik, depending on your typology, running iBGP over layer 3 is > probably better than EoIP. In the > past, I wasn't happy with the way things worked over EoIP. It's now over a > direct, layer 2 connection and > works 100%. You can run setup multi-hop BGP routing to do it over layer 3 > (single setting in Winbox) but > it's not as clean. > > Could you have the path between the two routers be layer 2 via VPLS or > just using switches? > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> VPLS is not currently present, thats on my "to learn" list >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jesse DuPont < >> jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote: >> >>> The two BGP routers do not need to be on the same L2 network for the >>> iBGP connection. >>> >>> >>> *Jesse DuPont* >>> >>> Network Architect >>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net >>> Celerity Networks LLC >>> >>> Celerity Broadband LLC >>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc >>> >>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband >>> On 5/3/16 10:25 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>> >>> A BGP speaker would be a router speaking BGP. In this case, most likely >>> your routers at the edge of your network that connect to your providers. >>> >>> Are the routers that are between your two BGP routers capable of running >>> BGP, resource wise? >>> >>> Can you do a VPLS tunnel between your two BGP routers? If not, what >>> about a VLAN? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 11:13:36 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF >>> >>> Mike, i said helmet, explain it to me like you would a 10 year old, then >>> dumb it down to my level from there. >>> >>> I dont know what a bgp speaker is >>> >>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Mike Hammett < <af...@ics-il.net> >>> af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Your OSPF network will just use default routes to get to your BGP >>>> speakers. >>>> >>>> Your BGP speakers with full routes will choose the best path. Your BGP >>>> speakers should be connected together, via direct connection, layer 2 >>>> tunnel (VPLS) or via intermediary iBGP speakers. Those iBGP speakers in the >>>> middle of your network will route the correct way, based on BGP. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" < <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 10:41:52 AM >>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] BGP and OSPF >>>> >>>> We currently have a /22 with 2 /24 statically routed in each of our >>>> providers. We are moving to BGP. >>>> >>>> What Im still unclear on is how my OSPF network is going to decide on >>>> the best path for data to flow externally >>>> >>>> can somebody give me the helmet version of how this is accomplished >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
