I understand this, but its still a second new component to something I already am not competent in
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:25 PM, can...@believewireless.net < p...@believewireless.net> wrote: > iBGP and eBGP are the same thing as far as configuration goes. (i) means > you are using BGP internal to your network > and (e) means you are using BGP to your providers. How you set them up is > exactly the same. > > The only different with multi-hop is that you have to set the maximum > number of hops away the BGP peer can be. > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:23 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> No, I cant add any topology changes or try to bring in unfamiliar things >> like ibgp or mpls/vpls while bringing in something unfamiliar like BGP >> unless I run out of interim options >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, can...@believewireless.net < >> p...@believewireless.net> wrote: >> >>> With Mikrotik, depending on your typology, running iBGP over layer 3 is >>> probably better than EoIP. In the >>> past, I wasn't happy with the way things worked over EoIP. It's now over >>> a direct, layer 2 connection and >>> works 100%. You can run setup multi-hop BGP routing to do it over layer >>> 3 (single setting in Winbox) but >>> it's not as clean. >>> >>> Could you have the path between the two routers be layer 2 via VPLS or >>> just using switches? >>> >>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> VPLS is not currently present, thats on my "to learn" list >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jesse DuPont < >>>> jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The two BGP routers do not need to be on the same L2 network for the >>>>> iBGP connection. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Jesse DuPont* >>>>> >>>>> Network Architect >>>>> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net >>>>> Celerity Networks LLC >>>>> >>>>> Celerity Broadband LLC >>>>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc >>>>> >>>>> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband >>>>> On 5/3/16 10:25 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>>>> >>>>> A BGP speaker would be a router speaking BGP. In this case, most >>>>> likely your routers at the edge of your network that connect to your >>>>> providers. >>>>> >>>>> Are the routers that are between your two BGP routers capable of >>>>> running BGP, resource wise? >>>>> >>>>> Can you do a VPLS tunnel between your two BGP routers? If not, what >>>>> about a VLAN? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 11:13:36 AM >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF >>>>> >>>>> Mike, i said helmet, explain it to me like you would a 10 year old, >>>>> then dumb it down to my level from there. >>>>> >>>>> I dont know what a bgp speaker is >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Mike Hammett < <af...@ics-il.net> >>>>> af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Your OSPF network will just use default routes to get to your BGP >>>>>> speakers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your BGP speakers with full routes will choose the best path. Your >>>>>> BGP speakers should be connected together, via direct connection, layer 2 >>>>>> tunnel (VPLS) or via intermediary iBGP speakers. Those iBGP speakers in >>>>>> the >>>>>> middle of your network will route the correct way, based on BGP. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" < <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 10:41:52 AM >>>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] BGP and OSPF >>>>>> >>>>>> We currently have a /22 with 2 /24 statically routed in each of our >>>>>> providers. We are moving to BGP. >>>>>> >>>>>> What Im still unclear on is how my OSPF network is going to decide on >>>>>> the best path for data to flow externally >>>>>> >>>>>> can somebody give me the helmet version of how this is accomplished >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.