21+15 just checked
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Isn't it 21+18 max?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 6, 2016 10:52 AM, "Mathew Howard"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
only if the power is set wrong.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Epmp is like 6 dB less power?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 6, 2016 10:47 AM, "Mathew Howard"
<[email protected]> wrote:
The only direct comparison I've seen with the
same antennas at the AP was the one Jerry Head
mentioned here... and he wasn't able to confirm
that TX power was the same.
The other thing that I'm wondering about is if
the fact that the Cambium sectors are dual slant
instead of H/V has something to do with it.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Ken Hohhof
<[email protected]> wrote:
Someone asked whether the xmt power was
apples-to-apples, has that been answered?
If the antennas are comparable, it would seem
the only explanations for different rcv
signal would be xmt power, or calibration error.
*From:* Chuck McCown <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, June 06, 2016 8:18 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
I think if I was cambium, I would have a
couple of guys on a plane or in a car with a
suitcase of equipment to visit you in the field.
This was not the intended or expected outcome
for that product.
*From:* Josh Luthman
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Sunday, June 05, 2016 8:17 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Never really left. I would have to lose
customers with epmp 2.4 wifi due to lack of
signal.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 5, 2016 10:12 PM, "Paul McCall"
<[email protected]> wrote:
So you went back to UBNT in 2.4?
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]]
*On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Sunday, June 5, 2016 9:57 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
No. I have no pmp450 in my network simply
due to cost.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Paul
McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
Josh,
Have you tried 450 2.4 in the exact
situation where ePMP 2.4 “sucked”?
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]]
*On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Thursday, June 2, 2016 5:10 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just
suck at penetration. I've done Ubnt KPP
and IT Elite - they all performed terribly.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay
Fuller <[email protected]> wrote:
hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure
with ubnt we're using kp performance.
With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas...
----- Original Message -----
*From:*Ken Hohhof
<mailto:[email protected]>
*To:*[email protected]
*Sent:*Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Jay, I suspect the difference you are
seeing may be mainly in the
antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor
should penetrate the same, the radio
waves don’t care what brand radio
launched them. And I think the
difference between the platforms will
be most evident in low interference
environment where they can achieve
their full modulation and throughput.
With low SNR, I think it’s kind of
like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for
off road racing, neither will be able
to show off its capabilities.
Receiver sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz
won’t matter.
*From:*CBB - Jay Fuller
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:*Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM
*To:*[email protected]
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Also interested in interference
rejection of the pmp450 - is there
any (in 2.4)
we are getting better foliage
penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp
2.4 - - and from the performance of
the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it
penetrated better!
----- Original Message -----
*From:*Matt
<mailto:[email protected]>
*To:*[email protected]
*Sent:*Thursday, June 02, 2016
2:25 PM
*Subject:*[AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450
deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and
some we inherited as well. Have
some ePMP we have tested but so far
have not deployed more then
couple test links.
For those who have tried both
ePMP and PMP450 what are the
differences
you have seen in performance?
Interference tolerance among others?
For those that have gone with
PMP450 over ePMP what was the
reasoning?
