UBNT AC with RFelement horn antennas or with the 3x30 degree UBNT sector. Firmware is stable enough now. Outperforms ePMP for sure.
Dont believe these „you will not get 256QAM“ prayers from people selling 64QAM Equipment. Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von CBB - Jay Fuller Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2016 22:32 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP We are looking at an environment of about 3/4ths of a mile, high concentration, line of sight. Hoping to do at least 60 down - prefer 100 + down and at least 4 - prefer 40-60 up. Had considered EPMP. Had also considered ubnt ac. Seriously considering mimosa. Which product will do the best with the most subs? ----- Original Message ----- From: can...@believewireless.net <mailto:can...@believewireless.net> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:21 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP ePMP is adding beam forming and should be available in the next few weeks. 450's beam forming will be a little later this summer. If you get use lots of small antennas, ePMP works well. If you want a limited number of antennas with high subscriber count, 450 is better. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com <mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP: > > Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps. > > I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times, but I > don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this as a > percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in the web UI). > Are these all excellent connections? On average what distance on these CPE's?
