I doubt it.
Do you feel that adjacent channel interference is affecting you? I don't
think it would help same channel interference.
Also, 450i has some features that probably aren't of use in the 2.4 band,
like more CPU horsepower, 30/40 MHz channels, and wideband (4.9-5.8 GHz) on
a single SKU.
Not sure if 450m with beamforming would be useful in 2.4.
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 2:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
So is PMP450i coming too the 2.4GHZ band? Would certainly help with noise.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
Take into account the 24-25dBm Tx power on a 2.4 FSK AP vs 22dBm on a 2.4
450 AP. And you'll probably get a better pattern on a sector vs omni. A
V-pol omni doesn't typically have a horrible pattern though. Except for
vertical beamwidth. Then you play with electronic downtilt models, etc. So
it's probably moot as far as Rx power levels go between the two.
We get OK penetration on the 2.4 450 sector we have up. Not so much the
noise at the tower as it is at the SMs. We're going to get rid of it
eventually along with all of the other 2.4 shit. It's a dead band just
like
900 to us now.
On 6/7/2016 1:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Omni to a sector, of course. You're probably getting more than 2 db
unless
it was a bonkers big omni and super small sector.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I have moved from pmp100 to 450 on 2.4ghz. Didn't do a cluster though.
Went from a 2.4FSK on a 12db Omni to a two 450 sectors from KP 120 beam
width (think 14db) . Was able to hook up every single customer I has on
the
FSK to the 450 and some were near-LOS. The 450 in 2.4ghz actually has
impressively decent nLOS. I think its a lot better than the 3.65 for
NLOS. (
I have used all the 450 frequency bands except 900)
If you thinking about going 450 in 2.4 and you already have FSK up on 2.4
and nothing abmormal with your noise floor then do it. You'll love it.
The
450 is actually better because you can run 10-mhz channels to get around
some of the noise in 2.4 vs the FSK which was stuck at 20mhz
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
So has anyone moved a PMP100 2.4 cluster too PMP450 2.4 and how did
that go? With PMP100 in 2.4 we do pretty good on near LOS
connections. Only deployed PMP450 in 3.6 and 5ghz so far though.
> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and
> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far
> have not deployed more then couple test links.
>
> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences
> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others?
>
> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning?
