Has anyone tried 450 3.65 for near Los situations like this discussion? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 7, 2016 2:46 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
> Take into account the 24-25dBm Tx power on a 2.4 FSK AP vs 22dBm on a 2.4 > 450 AP. And you'll probably get a better pattern on a sector vs omni. A > V-pol omni doesn't typically have a horrible pattern though. Except for > vertical beamwidth. Then you play with electronic downtilt models, etc. So > it's probably moot as far as Rx power levels go between the two. > > We get OK penetration on the 2.4 450 sector we have up. Not so much the > noise at the tower as it is at the SMs. We're going to get rid of it > eventually along with all of the other 2.4 shit. It's a dead band just like > 900 to us now. > > On 6/7/2016 1:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Omni to a sector, of course. You're probably getting more than 2 db > unless it was a bonkers big omni and super small sector. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have moved from pmp100 to 450 on 2.4ghz. Didn't do a cluster though. >> Went from a 2.4FSK on a 12db Omni to a two 450 sectors from KP 120 beam >> width (think 14db) . Was able to hook up every single customer I has on the >> FSK to the 450 and some were near-LOS. The 450 in 2.4ghz actually has >> impressively decent nLOS. I think its a lot better than the 3.65 for NLOS. >> ( I have used all the 450 frequency bands except 900) >> >> If you thinking about going 450 in 2.4 and you already have FSK up on 2.4 >> and nothing abmormal with your noise floor then do it. You'll love it. The >> 450 is actually better because you can run 10-mhz channels to get around >> some of the noise in 2.4 vs the FSK which was stuck at 20mhz >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> So has anyone moved a PMP100 2.4 cluster too PMP450 2.4 and how did >>> that go? With PMP100 in 2.4 we do pretty good on near LOS >>> connections. Only deployed PMP450 in 3.6 and 5ghz so far though. >>> >>> >>> > We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >>> > some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>> > have not deployed more then couple test links. >>> > >>> > For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >>> > you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>> > >>> > For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >>> >> >> > >
