I have moved from pmp100 to 450 on 2.4ghz. Didn't do a cluster though. Went from a 2.4FSK on a 12db Omni to a two 450 sectors from KP 120 beam width (think 14db) . Was able to hook up every single customer I has on the FSK to the 450 and some were near-LOS. The 450 in 2.4ghz actually has impressively decent nLOS. I think its a lot better than the 3.65 for NLOS. ( I have used all the 450 frequency bands except 900)
If you thinking about going 450 in 2.4 and you already have FSK up on 2.4 and nothing abmormal with your noise floor then do it. You'll love it. The 450 is actually better because you can run 10-mhz channels to get around some of the noise in 2.4 vs the FSK which was stuck at 20mhz On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > So has anyone moved a PMP100 2.4 cluster too PMP450 2.4 and how did > that go? With PMP100 in 2.4 we do pretty good on near LOS > connections. Only deployed PMP450 in 3.6 and 5ghz so far though. > > > > We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and > > some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far > > have not deployed more then couple test links. > > > > For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences > > you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? > > > > For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >
