Type N connectors are not in common use above 6 GHz.  Believe me or not.  

You wanna go above 6, there are plenty of other cheaper and better connectors 
to use.  N connector concentricity is not inherent to the design of the 
connector.  And concentricity is essential to good return loss.  

You send me an N connector cable.  I will put it on a load and connect it to a 
vector network analyzer with a smith chart on the screen.   Will record video.  
Then I will wiggle the cable and back off the connector a bit you can see for  
yourself the dot (arc actually)  wander all over the place.  The higher the 
frequency the more it becomes a wild line.  

Then I will do the same for SMA and you can see for yourself which one is more 
stable.   Opinions don’t matter.  A dot is a dot, an arc is an arc and a 
squiggly line is a squiggly line.  

From: Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 7:53 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N

So, nothing personal by this... but if the connector is designed for it (and 
has several versions by other manufacturers to boot), has been used (and is 
still used) on testing equipment... I'm probably more inclined to take their 
word for it over yours.

On Jul 1, 2016 7:58 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  IMHO, 6 GHz is the upper limit.  

  From: Peter Kranz 
  Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 5:22 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N

  “Originally, the connector was designed to carry signals at frequencies up to 
1 GHz in military applications, but today's common Type N easily handles 
frequencies up to 11 GHz. More recent precision enhancements to the design by 
Julius Botka at Hewlett Packard have pushed this to 18 GHz.”



  http://inmet.apitech.com/inmet/micro-inmet-between-typen.cfm



  Peter Kranz
  www.UnwiredLtd.com
  Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
  Mobile: 510-207-0000
  pkr...@unwiredltd.com



  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
  Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 3:24 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N



  Yeah, I think this is a case of somebody bowing their neck - a pissing 
contest between a boss and underlings at UBNT.  



  From: Eric Kuhnke 

  Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 4:19 PM

  To: af@afmug.com 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N



  I have never in my life personally seen an N connector rated above 11 GHz. 
High-quality/expensive N connectors are used extensively in two way satellite - 
such as with 3.0 meter C-band Tx/Rx earth station dishes...  But you only use N 
for the 50 ohm coax cables from the modem (indoors) to the electronics which 
lives directly attached to the waveguide/feed on the dish (Rx LNB and Tx 
SSPA/BUC). 

  The coax is used between 1.2 to 1.8 GHz to communicate with the Tx and Rx 
electronics on the dish. A satellite LNB on the Rx side is basically a 10:1 
ratio downconverter.

  Like so: http://beta.satcomresources.com/sca/images/NORS3120N_detail-3.jpg

  There's your single polarity waveguide interface on one side, N on the other. 



  On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

    First of all, I have never seen an N connector rated above 11 GHz, and 
those are extra expensive.

    If there is an 18 GHz version, it will be even more expensive.  



    This will not be a cable you can make yourself in the field and it will be 
very sensitive to being fully seated so you will probably have to use a torque 
wrench to make it work at 18 GHz.  



    Silly.  You can weatherproof an SMA just as easy as an N connector.  Good 
heatshrink can be found for both.  

    Folks trying to use N connectors at 18 GHz are going to quickly get 
introduced to the world of return loss problems.  







    Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Rob Genovesi
    Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2016 01:32
    An: af@afmug.com
    Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N



    From Gary-UBNT:

    "We are working on data sheets right now so hopefully you will get more 
questions answered shortly.  The reason for N connectors relates to demand for 
higher mechanical robustness and the ability for the connectors to be 
weather-proof as a stand alone connector (fully weatherproof gaskets and the 
ability to accept larger diameter jumpers readily).  The N connectors we use 
are rated to 18+ GHz."

    An active thread on the UBNT forums right now, more available here: 
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/Some-AF11X-details/td-p/1512145

    -Rob



    On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

      I'm looking at all the other AF-nnX radios from UBNT, and they all use 
SMA connectors. What reason would they have to use N instead of SMA? Seems the 
SMA connector would have fewer issues at 11 GHz. 




Reply via email to