I have never in my life personally seen an N connector rated above 11 GHz.
High-quality/expensive N connectors are used extensively in two way
satellite - such as with 3.0 meter C-band Tx/Rx earth station dishes...
But you only use N for the 50 ohm coax cables from the modem (indoors) to
the electronics which lives directly attached to the waveguide/feed on the
dish (Rx LNB and Tx SSPA/BUC).

The coax is used between 1.2 to 1.8 GHz to communicate with the Tx and Rx
electronics on the dish. A satellite LNB on the Rx side is basically a 10:1
ratio downconverter.

Like so: http://beta.satcomresources.com/sca/images/NORS3120N_detail-3.jpg

There's your single polarity waveguide interface on one side, N on the
other.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> First of all, I have never seen an N connector rated above 11 GHz, and
> those are extra expensive.
> If there is an 18 GHz version, it will be even more expensive.
>
> This will not be a cable you can make yourself in the field and it will be
> very sensitive to being fully seated so you will probably have to use a
> torque wrench to make it work at 18 GHz.
>
> Silly.  You can weatherproof an SMA just as easy as an N connector.  Good
> heatshrink can be found for both.
> Folks trying to use N connectors at 18 GHz are going to quickly get
> introduced to the world of return loss problems.
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Rob Genovesi
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2016 01:32
> *An:* af@afmug.com
> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Convert Andrew Dragonwave dishes to N
>
>
>
> From Gary-UBNT:
>
> "We are working on data sheets right now so hopefully you will get more
> questions answered shortly.  The reason for N connectors relates to demand
> for higher mechanical robustness and the ability for the connectors to be
> weather-proof as a stand alone connector (fully weatherproof gaskets and
> the ability to accept larger diameter jumpers readily).  The N connectors
> we use are rated to 18+ GHz."
>
> An active thread on the UBNT forums right now, more available here:
> http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/Some-AF11X-details/td-p/1512145
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm looking at all the other AF-nnX radios from UBNT, and they all use SMA
> connectors. What reason would they have to use N instead of SMA? Seems the
> SMA connector would have fewer issues at 11 GHz.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to