You've already got the NIDs at all of the houses and then you charge $50
for activation?  Why/how did you get every house wired and ready before
they signed up for service?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
wrote:

> Ah, sorry, all of the outside box and splice are already done (NID).
>
>
>
> So this is very similar to a CPE install for wireless, only no roof work.
>
>
>
> The installer places the ONT device in the NID and connects up the house
> Ethernet to it.
>
> They usually cross-connect the Cat5e inside the house to a port in a
> central room, and connect the wireless router there.
>
>
>
> Average is about an hour an install I think.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 11, 2016 10:03 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
>
>
> An ONT install is $50???  Are these tiny Chinese children?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2016 11:50 AM, "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net>
> wrote:
>
> Partner companies do the construction phase and drops/splicing.
>
>
>
> I contract out the CPE/ONT and inside install for $50 an install.
>
>
>
> I also contract LinkTechs for larger scale mikrotik programming and
> configuration.
>
>
>
> I have a local company and other local people on contract for help with
> site maintenance and setup and other network monitoring and site
> engineering.
>
>
>
> Most of my phone calls are sales so I do all of that personally since it’s
> only a call or two a day.
>
>
>
> I handle front line support since again it’s very few calls or messages.
>
>
>
> I do find now days that support and even sales come in from a lot of
> different sources.
>
> I get phone calls, texts, emails and facebook messages that I respond to.
>
>
>
> It’s a lot different from a few years ago where it was mostly phone calls
> and emails.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:27 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
>
>
> what do you pay these contractors and for what work?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
> wrote:
>
> Yes? (pops head out of hole)
>
>
>
> I am the only employee, everyone else is contracted.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:36 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
>
>
> Yep, ask Sterling.
>
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:27 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
>
>
> Contractors?
>
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I can run a WISP by myself, (have been for 12 years), no way to do fiber
> without any employees. First two good employees is going to cost what?
> $100k/year? I'm gonna keep on doing it this way as long as i can!!!
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
> A bunch of folks on this list doing fiber with very few employees.
>
> Wireless is and always will be ersatz fiber at best.
>
>
>
> *From:* Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:14 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
>
>
> I looked into doing fiber a couple years back but was too cost prohibitive
> and was going to require too many employees. Glad I waited because now it
> looks like we can get fiber type speeds over wireless with some of the new
> radios coming out. Plus you wont have to worry about someone cutting your
> fiber! I really did not want to own plant that was in the public right of
> ways. Now i can keep on my plant on private property.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My grampa used to say "you can't put 10 lbs of shit in a 2 lb bag"..... I
> didn't realize there were other variants :)
>
>
>
> The camel thing is used in the bible as a metaphor for something nearly
> impossible.  "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle
> than for a rich man to go to heaven"....or something to that effect.  (I
> hope nobody here has gotten too rich, we want to see you on the other side).
>
>
>
> I imagine Reynolds understands the metaphor, but not the application of
> it.  He may be right to question it.  Google has probably weighed the
> options. .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>
> Sent: 8/10/2016 1:36:38 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
>
>
> You can't put 12 pounds of shit in a 10 pound bag.
>
>
>
> You can't get 100 gbps in ~100 MHz of spectrum.
>
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have looked this phrase up, but I still don't understand it.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> > They may have great RF engineers, but you still cannot fit a camel
> through
> > the eye of a needle.
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:04 AM
> > To: af@afmug.com
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
> >
> > So, I get it. You guys are sitting around feeling so smug with your WISP.
> >
> > We're talking about one of the largest and most powerful companies in
> > the world though. Do you really think they don't have some of the best
> > RF engineering talent in the world on their payroll?
> >
> > They're not doing anything different than many of us have done, which
> > is evaluate the business case for each technology and pick the most
> > appropriate one for the application. If it was going to cost you a
> > couple hundred thousand just to cross an intersection, you'd be doing
> > the same thing too. It's the smart play.
> >
> > At least they're not doing this in LEC style, which would mean "saying
> > they can't do it unless they receive federal subsidies".
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller
> > <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Wait until they experience ducting ;)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Bill Prince
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:48 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
> >>
> >> It's apparently "too expensive" to do underground fiber. At least in San
> >> Jose.
> >>
> >> Anyone know anything about Webpass?
> >>
> >>
> >> bp
> >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> >>
> >> On 8/10/2016 9:44 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
> >>
> >> Google Fiber considering fixed microwave technology as alternative to
> >> fiber.
> >> Interesting times!
> >>
> >>
> >> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/
> 08/google-fiber-delays-san-jose-project-may-switch-to-
> wireless-instead/?comments=1
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to