I didn't know people that had jobs went to Burning Man.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert" <i...@avantwireless.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 4:26:26 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave? Also, who shows up at Burning Man... Going there, to me, is not what someone who is working hard each and every day does. On 8/12/16 2:19 AM, i...@avantwireless.com wrote: > I think the difference between google and facebook and even more so > tesla is how driven the people on top are. Google is now in what I > call fiefdomville, where the execs below the top have built their > kingdoms and are struggling to stay on top and those above pretty much > have everything their heart desires and the drive to the next big > thing has left. FB and tesla still have one person on top that wants > a _lot_ more for their future and specially in Tesla's case has a huge > goal far out on the horizon to poke them in the ass to reach far each > and every day.. Bezos at amazon is also in that camp to a degree... > As I like to say.. Where's google's spaceship? > > > On 8/11/16 9:27 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >> I think that facebook won't be far behind. Let's have this >> conversation again in 2026. >> >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> On 8/11/2016 8:50 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: >>> So... Google is going to do what WISP's have been doing for 20 years >>> (before they were even called WISPs). That's hilarious. >>> >>> "Fiber! Fiber! Fiber! That is the answer to everything. We are doing >>> fiber everywhere!" >>> "Fiber is expensive, and we can never get an ROI with that model... >>> let's look at wireless." >>> >>> I'm still laughing... a company that size, with those resources, and >>> yet they still seem to be clueless sometimes. I'm in agreement, I >>> doubt Google will even be around in 20 years. I own several >>> e-commerce companies (multi-million dollar ones), and we don't spend >>> a dime with Google. One company spends $5k/month with Facebook and >>> it generates $400k in sales, per month. >>> >>> Google is becoming "old school"... the same way email is compared to >>> texting... and the way texting/FB/Instagram is compared to Snapchat. >>> These companies get big, really fast... but the problem is, that >>> means someone else can do the same thing. >>> >>> Travis >>> >>> >>> On 8/11/2016 6:26 PM, Robert Andrews wrote: >>>> Sorry to sound like not a google fanboy but it's a typical phd >>>> company.. They look at the paper pile before the experience >>>> pile... & yes they will eventually go down because of it... >>>> >>>> On 08/11/2016 03:24 PM, Brian Webster wrote: >>>>> Having been directly involved in the Google Fiber projects, I can >>>>> tell you there are a number of factors that caused them to take >>>>> pause on the deployments. One was the almost obstructionist >>>>> attitude of pole owners (read competitors to their broadband >>>>> deployment). This forced a lot more of the project deigns to >>>>> underground deployment. In cities like San Jose and San Francisco, >>>>> there were a lot of requirements that cost more money than Google >>>>> budgeted for. In some respects Google kind of had the idea that >>>>> cities would remove obstacles like that to get them in their city. >>>>> With so much existing broadband already in place, this is >>>>> certainly not the case. I think Google thought all cities were >>>>> going to have the attitude like they had with the first cities who >>>>> applied for Google to come to their cities (Like Kansas City did). >>>>> >>>>> Google was also of the impression that they could design and >>>>> permit their networks and then cherry pick neighborhoods to deploy >>>>> based on pre-sign ups (in Google terms - fiberhoods). This creates >>>>> a huge logistic problem in planning construction especially with >>>>> underground deployment. This also drove up costs. >>>>> >>>>> Google is still investigating the wireless options. What you will >>>>> see from them should be a hybrid network system. They will buy up >>>>> dark fiber, capacity on lit fiber, conduit space and whole fiber >>>>> systems where they can. They may use microwave to cross connect >>>>> systems or bridge high construction cost areas such as railroad >>>>> crossings. They are looking at wireless to basically go more from >>>>> the curb to the customer, especially in MDU cases. Existing >>>>> competition and/or existing contracts within an MDU makes it risky >>>>> to do a wired play if they cannot assure themselves of a huge take >>>>> rate within the MDU. I see their wireless play as more of a high >>>>> capacity short hop last mile, but even then they will have >>>>> challenges with spectrum, interference and capacity. >>>>> >>>>> While we all would think Google is a great company with resources >>>>> to do whatever they set their minds to, keep in mind I have seen a >>>>> lot from the inside. I like to equate them to a group of thirty >>>>> somethings with ADD and too much money. They also seem to have the >>>>> attitude that older folks are too far behind the times to possibly >>>>> know what they are talking about. Google is certainly not a >>>>> utility infrastructure company and lack the people, tools and >>>>> skill sets to be one. They are their own best cheerleaders and >>>>> they have a dangerous habit of believing their own hype internally >>>>> and are not real good at listening to fresh viewpoints and outside >>>>> input. >>>>> >>>>> Thank You, >>>>> Brian Webster >>>>> www.wirelessmapping.com >>>>> www.Broadband-Mapping.com >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 1:29 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave? >>>>> >>>>> They may have great RF engineers, but you still cannot fit a camel >>>>> through the eye of a needle. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Josh Reynolds >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:04 AM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave? >>>>> >>>>> So, I get it. You guys are sitting around feeling so smug with >>>>> your WISP. >>>>> >>>>> We're talking about one of the largest and most powerful companies >>>>> in the world though. Do you really think they don't have some of >>>>> the best RF engineering talent in the world on their payroll? >>>>> >>>>> They're not doing anything different than many of us have done, >>>>> which is evaluate the business case for each technology and pick >>>>> the most appropriate one for the application. If it was going to >>>>> cost you a couple hundred thousand just to cross an intersection, >>>>> you'd be doing the same thing too. It's the smart play. >>>>> >>>>> At least they're not doing this in LEC style, which would mean >>>>> "saying they can't do it unless they receive federal subsidies". >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller >>>>> <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Wait until they experience ducting ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: Bill Prince >>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:48 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's apparently "too expensive" to do underground fiber. At least in >>>>>> San Jose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone know anything about Webpass? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/10/2016 9:44 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Google Fiber considering fixed microwave technology as >>>>>> alternative to >>>>>> fiber. >>>>>> Interesting times! >>>>>> >>>>>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/08/google-fiber-del >>>>>> >>>>>> ays-san-jose-project-may-switch-to-wireless-instead/?comments=1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >