Well if we've got unlimited money I'd choose Cambium too...
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:17 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would bet the vast majority of the UBNT fanboy base, if starting fresh, > with pockets of dough would choose cambium hands down. They just started > with UBNT cause they didnt have dough. Its like marrying the fat girl > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Cambium (and Motorola before them) have a long history of putting in the >> features ISP need and want, releasing stable firmware, not having blatant >> security vulnerabilities, being pretty darn easy to use, being well >> documented, releasing useful software for management, and being priced at >> an attainable level even if it's not the cheapest. The number of times I >> fixed a problem by rebooting a Canopy AP is basically zero. >> >> UBNT is cheaper, and probably good enough in many cases. In business, >> good enough and cheaper is sometimes a hard combo to argue with, but I >> would if it was me I would do Cambium. >> >> (disclaimer: I have not touched any Ubiquiti newer than M series) >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Sam Morris" <w...@csilogan.com> >> To: af@afmug.com >> Sent: 9/30/2016 9:47:16 AM >> Subject: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... >> >> Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely on >>> performance and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the other would >>> you select Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and CPE/SM hardware >>> (leaving the backhaul out of the discussion)? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sam >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
