Steve, did you never hear the song that goes “If you want to be happy for the rest of your life …”
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:17 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... I would bet the vast majority of the UBNT fanboy base, if starting fresh, with pockets of dough would choose cambium hands down. They just started with UBNT cause they didnt have dough. Its like marrying the fat girl On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> > wrote: Cambium (and Motorola before them) have a long history of putting in the features ISP need and want, releasing stable firmware, not having blatant security vulnerabilities, being pretty darn easy to use, being well documented, releasing useful software for management, and being priced at an attainable level even if it's not the cheapest. The number of times I fixed a problem by rebooting a Canopy AP is basically zero. UBNT is cheaper, and probably good enough in many cases. In business, good enough and cheaper is sometimes a hard combo to argue with, but I would if it was me I would do Cambium. (disclaimer: I have not touched any Ubiquiti newer than M series) ------ Original Message ------ From: "Sam Morris" <w...@csilogan.com <mailto:w...@csilogan.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: 9/30/2016 9:47:16 AM Subject: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely on performance and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the other would you select Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and CPE/SM hardware (leaving the backhaul out of the discussion)? Thanks, Sam -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
