lol, just looked it up, maybe i should put a ring on my old ladies finger then if ill be happy for the rest of my life
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > Steve, did you never hear the song that goes “If you want to be happy for > the rest of your life …” > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2016 9:17 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... > > > > I would bet the vast majority of the UBNT fanboy base, if starting fresh, > with pockets of dough would choose cambium hands down. They just started > with UBNT cause they didnt have dough. Its like marrying the fat girl > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Cambium (and Motorola before them) have a long history of putting in the > features ISP need and want, releasing stable firmware, not having blatant > security vulnerabilities, being pretty darn easy to use, being well > documented, releasing useful software for management, and being priced at > an attainable level even if it's not the cheapest. The number of times I > fixed a problem by rebooting a Canopy AP is basically zero. > > UBNT is cheaper, and probably good enough in many cases. In business, > good enough and cheaper is sometimes a hard combo to argue with, but I > would if it was me I would do Cambium. > > (disclaimer: I have not touched any Ubiquiti newer than M series) > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Sam Morris" <w...@csilogan.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: 9/30/2016 9:47:16 AM > Subject: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... > > Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely on > performance and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the other would > you select Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and CPE/SM hardware > (leaving the backhaul out of the discussion)? > > Thanks, > Sam > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
