I had an Escort for 6 years, gave to my brother who used it 4 years, gave to a friend who had 3 years before it was hit by drunk driver..... Ubnt has made allot more WISPs successful than any other product I know and have seen. Secondly the original Canopy line was used allot as well. Trango and others were used but Ubnt breath of products solved allot of issues. I recently replaced Powerbridges at sites that still work. We upgraded everything to MIMO but to get features and better performance in an ever noisier environment. I have used Cambium and Mimosa as well. But ubnt would be my choice for WISP clients, Mimosa and Cambium for backhauls
On Sep 30, 2016 9:03 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > lol, just looked it up, maybe i should put a ring on my old ladies finger > then if ill be happy for the rest of my life > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> Steve, did you never hear the song that goes “If you want to be happy for >> the rest of your life …” >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2016 9:17 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... >> >> >> >> I would bet the vast majority of the UBNT fanboy base, if starting fresh, >> with pockets of dough would choose cambium hands down. They just started >> with UBNT cause they didnt have dough. Its like marrying the fat girl >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Cambium (and Motorola before them) have a long history of putting in the >> features ISP need and want, releasing stable firmware, not having blatant >> security vulnerabilities, being pretty darn easy to use, being well >> documented, releasing useful software for management, and being priced at >> an attainable level even if it's not the cheapest. The number of times I >> fixed a problem by rebooting a Canopy AP is basically zero. >> >> UBNT is cheaper, and probably good enough in many cases. In business, >> good enough and cheaper is sometimes a hard combo to argue with, but I >> would if it was me I would do Cambium. >> >> (disclaimer: I have not touched any Ubiquiti newer than M series) >> >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Sam Morris" <w...@csilogan.com> >> To: af@afmug.com >> Sent: 9/30/2016 9:47:16 AM >> Subject: [AFMUG] Not to start a war... >> >> Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely on >> performance and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the other would >> you select Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and CPE/SM hardware >> (leaving the backhaul out of the discussion)? >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
