Let me ask a more obvious question.  If you had an unlimited amount of money, 
Why would you start an ISP.

 

Steve B.

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 10:19 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Not to start a war...

 

Well if we've got unlimited money I'd choose Cambium too...




 

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

 

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:17 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

I would bet the vast majority of the UBNT fanboy base, if starting fresh, with 
pockets of dough would choose cambium hands down. They just started with UBNT 
cause they didnt have dough. Its like marrying the fat girl

 

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

Cambium (and Motorola before them) have a long history of putting in the 
features ISP need and want, releasing stable firmware, not having blatant 
security vulnerabilities, being pretty darn easy to use, being well documented, 
releasing useful software for management, and being priced at an attainable 
level even if it's not the cheapest.  The number of times I fixed a problem by 
rebooting a Canopy AP is basically zero.

UBNT is cheaper, and probably good enough in many cases.  In business, good 
enough and cheaper is sometimes a hard combo to argue with, but I would if it 
was me I would do Cambium.

(disclaimer: I have not touched any Ubiquiti newer than M series)



------ Original Message ------
From: "Sam Morris" <w...@csilogan.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 9/30/2016 9:47:16 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Not to start a war...

Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely on performance 
and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the other would you select 
Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and CPE/SM hardware (leaving the backhaul 
out of the discussion)?

Thanks,
Sam

 





 

-- 

If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

 

Reply via email to