Salud On Oct 7, 2016 12:45 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> holy cow, I dont know how the end user performance is right now, but that > harq=2 made all these bastard CPEs manageable again > what does harq ack nack mean btw? I havent looked at the 320 ap > administration guide in a long time, i dont even remember why i opted not > to manipulate the flows and enable harq at the time, i was probably drunk > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yup >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >> >> >> I will try these things, I do appreciate it, I also set cpe isolation to >> block cpe destined packets, this should stop some idle traffic between >> units shouldnt it? >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Our power company is also using 3.65ghz Wimax as part of their smartgrid >>> system. Sounds like it is a backhaul to their 900mhz stuff. >>> >>> They don't have any authentication on their Wimax system (I presume they >>> limit network access by other means), so we tripped over them when some CPE >>> connected to their BS and the customers called us because they had no >>> internet access. >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> >>> Sent: 10/6/2016 10:25:50 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >>> >>> >>> GE MDS is pushing 3.65 SCADA allot >>> >>> On Oct 6, 2016 8:17 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> George, is this due to some weird weather by you? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, and one thing to consider if you have 3.65 interference, I found >>>> out ComEd is using 3.65 WiMAX for smartgrid, I don’t know if this is the >>>> top of the hierarchy for their 900 MHz stuff, or SCADA to substations. One >>>> tower by me they have 4 sectors and I think each AP only feeds 1-2 CPEs. >>>> It didn’t help that they totally messed up the lat/lon of their tower when >>>> they registered it in ULS. Once I looked at the CPE locations and drew >>>> lines following the stated azimuth, I saw they converged on a tower next to >>>> a ComEd facility. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> lol well it wont be coming from us for a while, we are going 3ghz silent >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dude, I'm seeing multipath and ducting like a somebitch. Started around >>>> dusk. Don't beat your head into your desk. I'm seeing some 11GHz links go >>>> from their nominal -45ish to like -35 to -60 in just a couple minutes, and >>>> BER alarms like crazy. This is teh suck. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/6/2016 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>> >>>> There is some nutty madness going on on a large portion of our 320 >>>> network, it has hit multiple sites at once. >>>> >>>> I know much of its self induced due to too many marginal installs on >>>> very limited access points >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get into to manage. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> uplink MCS for the most part looks good until i get into the frame >>>> utilization, tons of 16qam 1/2 and 100% usage with only 6-12 mbps >>>> throughput >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have been shifting frequencies across the network because it >>>> presented like interference, and a change on one AP results in required >>>> cascade changes across the 3ghz network since 320 sync doesnt actually >>>> work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> APs are basically default layer 2, no profiles changed, 7mhz channels >>>> mostly ABCD 90s and some split APs. sub counts range from 10 to 35 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I migrated a distant part of the network to 10mhz channels and am not >>>> seeing this issue, but subscriber counts are low >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Im at my wits end on this nonsense and am about to just put every AP on >>>> the network in SA mode to get a visual on what my spectrum looks like >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> we did turn up a 450 facing southwest ten miles south of another 320 AP >>>> thats facing south, it blinded the SMs to the 320 on a near channel even >>>> though they were only in the back lobe, but this is far from the others >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> any advice from you other guys stuck with wimax would be appreciated >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
