For Uplink (Index 1) try enabled, 2 retries. May need AP reboot. I've heard
of people combating interference by tweaking C/N table base up or down a
bit but haven't yet had the time to test it myself.



On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> disabled, no retries, what would help?
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> [image: Inline image 3]
>
>
> [image: Inline image 4]
> [image: Inline image 5]
>
>
>
> [image: Inline image 6]
>
> pictures were easier
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Under Config->ServiceFlows->QoS Profiles, do the profiles whose numbers
>> you're using (selected on the Default Parameters page) have HARQ enabled?
>> How many retries?
>>
>> Under config->Air Interface -> C/N config, what's the C/N Table Base?
>> default -70?
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is some nutty madness going on on a large portion of our 320
>>> network, it has hit multiple sites at once.
>>> I know much of its self induced due to too many marginal installs on
>>> very limited access points
>>>
>>> good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get into to manage.
>>>
>>> uplink MCS for the most part looks good until i get into the frame
>>> utilization, tons of 16qam 1/2 and 100% usage with only 6-12 mbps throughput
>>>
>>> I have been shifting frequencies across the network because it presented
>>> like interference, and a change on one AP results in required cascade
>>> changes across the 3ghz network since 320 sync doesnt actually work.
>>>
>>> APs are basically default layer 2, no profiles changed, 7mhz channels
>>> mostly ABCD 90s and some split APs. sub counts range from 10 to 35
>>>
>>> I migrated a distant part of the network to 10mhz channels and am not
>>> seeing this issue, but subscriber counts are low
>>>
>>> Im at my wits end on this nonsense and am about to just put every AP on
>>> the network in SA mode to get a visual on what my spectrum looks like
>>>
>>> we did turn up a 450 facing southwest ten miles south of another 320 AP
>>> thats facing south, it blinded the SMs to the 320 on a near channel even
>>> though they were only in the back lobe, but this is far from the others
>>>
>>> any advice from you other guys stuck with wimax would be appreciated
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to