disabled, no retries, what would help? [image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 2]
[image: Inline image 3] [image: Inline image 4] [image: Inline image 5] [image: Inline image 6] pictures were easier On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> wrote: > Under Config->ServiceFlows->QoS Profiles, do the profiles whose numbers > you're using (selected on the Default Parameters page) have HARQ enabled? > How many retries? > > Under config->Air Interface -> C/N config, what's the C/N Table Base? > default -70? > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is some nutty madness going on on a large portion of our 320 >> network, it has hit multiple sites at once. >> I know much of its self induced due to too many marginal installs on very >> limited access points >> >> good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get into to manage. >> >> uplink MCS for the most part looks good until i get into the frame >> utilization, tons of 16qam 1/2 and 100% usage with only 6-12 mbps throughput >> >> I have been shifting frequencies across the network because it presented >> like interference, and a change on one AP results in required cascade >> changes across the 3ghz network since 320 sync doesnt actually work. >> >> APs are basically default layer 2, no profiles changed, 7mhz channels >> mostly ABCD 90s and some split APs. sub counts range from 10 to 35 >> >> I migrated a distant part of the network to 10mhz channels and am not >> seeing this issue, but subscriber counts are low >> >> Im at my wits end on this nonsense and am about to just put every AP on >> the network in SA mode to get a visual on what my spectrum looks like >> >> we did turn up a 450 facing southwest ten miles south of another 320 AP >> thats facing south, it blinded the SMs to the 320 on a near channel even >> though they were only in the back lobe, but this is far from the others >> >> any advice from you other guys stuck with wimax would be appreciated >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
