Did you read what I said to do? What's with that?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 5:46:42 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
Syncing requires everything working together. Dynamic allocation requires
everything working as each AP sees is best. The two are at opposition. Making
them work together likely means sacrificing so much of one or maybe both of
them as to make them almost useless.
In no engineer and notably ignorant but that is how I see it.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016, 5:30 PM Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote:
Why?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Ken Hohhof" < af...@kwisp.com >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:50:23 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
Seems like fool’s gold, the concept is fundamentally flawed, not just waiting
for someone to do it right.
From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
I'm not throwing vinegar. Just being an honest skeptic. ;-) bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/10/2016 2:20 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
<blockquote>
That's fine. It's not something I'm holding my breath on, but if someone does
it, great.
Throwing vinegar on it won't help, though.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:19:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
Great in theory. I'll believe it when I see it. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/10/2016 2:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
<blockquote>
It's system-wide. The controller is in your NOC. Perhaps one of the SDN
technologies could manage the ratios. I'll admit that I haven't done much with
OpenDayLight, but something like this fits into it's hype wheelhouse.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:13:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
That's OK for maybe one POP. How do you make sure the 6 POPs around you do the
same thing?
bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/10/2016 2:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
<blockquote>
Controller knows system-wide what's up and sends out updates every so often to
change at a certain time slot. It doesn't have to be real-time. Once a minute?
Once every five minutes? It doesn't even need to be infinitely variable. Maybe
there's four to eight settings that it goes among? Maybe you mark some devices
as priority so their needs weighted more greatly, but otherwise if half the
system is hitting contention in a given direction, move up to the next ratio at
that next time slot.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 3:48:15 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
I suppose if you negotiate ratio on every single transmission, you could
come up with a terribly inefficient protocol that would be synced and
dynamic.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 2:46 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
Synced dynamic ratio is pure fairy dust.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/10/2016 1:36 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> attempting to have a synced dynamic ratio platform, though. Hopefully
> someone gets this some day.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
