well that escalate quickly On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> I think he was referring to another type of "knocked off" > > On Jan 23, 2017 11:14 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I don’t think anyone has ever been knocked off the list. Shouted down at >> times. Insulted. But never knocked off. >> >> Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either >> side of an argument at will for fun. >> >> With the exception of being a Clinton supporter. Just cannot make myself >> go there. >> >> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm >> *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2017 7:47 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >> >> just fyi if jaime gets knocked off the list, im taking my toys and going >> home >> >> in 4 years hes going to be showing us pictures of tecate and some >> insanely tasty looking crow anyway :-) >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> I don't buy that... Respect your opinion but I don't buy that 63 >>> list... >>> >>> I have no confidence in Trump... I think he is bad for our country... I >>> will not change my mind. If you want to knock me off list... It's cool... >>> I have always remained true to my beliefs. My last post on this one... >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 3:50 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>> >>> Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were involved in >>> some way with the JFK assassination? >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>> One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63 people are >>> as dead as you can get and all of them either spilled the beans on the >>> Clintons or had information that could harm the Clintons. >>> >>> So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not yet heard >>> of anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better at doing it. >>> >>> 1. Susan Coleman: >>> 2. Larry Guerrin: >>> 3. Kevin Ives >>> 4. Don Henry: >>> 5. Keith Coney: >>> 6. Keith McKaskle: >>> 7. Gregory Collins: >>> 8. Jeff Rhodes: >>> 9. James Milam: >>> 10. Richard Winters: >>> 11. Jordan Kettleson: >>> 12. Alan Standorf: >>> 13. Dennis Eisman: . >>> 14. Danny Casalaro: >>> 15. Victor Raiser: >>> 16. R. Montgomery Raiser: >>> 17. Paul Tully: >>> 18. Ian Spiro: >>> 19. Paula Gober: >>> 20. Jim Wilhite: >>> 21. Steve Willis, >>> 22. Robert Williams, >>> 23. Todd McKeahan >>> 24. Conway LeBleu: >>> 25. Sgt. Brian Haney, >>> 26. Sgt. Tim Sabel, >>> 27. Maj. William Barkley, >>> 28. Capt. Scott Reynolds: >>> 29. John Crawford: >>> 30. John Wilson: >>> 31. Paul Wilcher: >>> 32. Vincent Foster: >>> 33. Jon Parnell Walker: >>> 34. Stanley Heard >>> 35. Steven Dickson: >>> 36. Jerry Luther Parks: >>> 37. Ed Willey: >>> 38. Gandy Baugh: >>> 39. Herschell Friday: >>> 40. Ronald Rogers: >>> 41. Kathy Furguson: >>> 42. Bill Shelton: >>> 43. Stanley Huggins: >>> 44. Paul Olson: >>> 45. Calvin Walraven: >>> 46. Alan G. Whicher: >>> 47. Duane Garrett: >>> 48. Ron Brown:. >>> 49. Charles Meissner: >>> 50. William Colby: >>> 51. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: >>> 52. Lance Herndon: >>> 53. Neil Moody: >>> 54. Barbara Wise: >>> 55. Doug Adams: >>> 56. Mary C. Mahoney: >>> 57. Ronald Miller: >>> 58. Sandy Hume: >>> 59. Jim McDougal: >>> 60. Johnny Lawhon: >>> 61. Charles Wilbourne Miller: >>> 62. Carlos Ghigliotti: >>> 63. Tony Moser: >>> >>> >>> From: Josh Reynolds >>> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>> >>> He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. Some >>> were legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your >>> right. I do not. >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions. >>> Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly >>> 'spenders' >>> >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often >>> happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence. >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if >>> your looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. >>> >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... >>> Waiting for right time to do it comrades >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>> >>> https://streamable.com/md28v >>> >>> I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not >>> some kind of joke taken too far... >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza < >>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. >>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpo >>> st.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. >>> The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >>> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let >>> me Trumpspeak... So sad. >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> there is this gem now >>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very difficult >>> to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very biased >>> even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is biased, >>> too. >>> >>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it >>> was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable >>> here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and >>> would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion >>> away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable. >>> >>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which >>> is minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >>> >>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >>> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem >>> than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >>> reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure you >>> have a problem. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy >>> /sarcasm >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>> An: af@afmug.com >>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to >>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current >>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA >>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and >>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of getting >>> information. We know more in real time then the press could ever package up >>> and present. The current mindset of media in press conferences is that of >>> militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero professionalism >>> from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, >>> theyre going to report whatever their preconceived response was either way. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Answer: Yes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 ISIS >>> fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who >>> would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >>> transition of power. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >>> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous >>> time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >>> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime >>> charges possible? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 >>> ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS >>> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by the >>> first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >>> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's >>> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with >>> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >>> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >>> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >>> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
