>Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either side of >an argument at will for fun.
Are you a Gemini by any chance ? Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: ch...@wbmfg.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:14:54 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > I don’t think anyone has ever been knocked off the list. Shouted down at > times. > Insulted. But never knocked off. > Sometimes when I am trolling, I touch a nerve. I can switch to either side of > an > argument at will for fun. > With the exception of being a Clinton supporter. Just cannot make myself go > there. > From: That One Guy /sarcasm > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 7:47 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > just fyi if jaime gets knocked off the list, im taking my toys and going home > in 4 years hes going to be showing us pictures of tecate and some insanely > tasty > looking crow anyway :-) > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza < losguyswirel...@gmail.com > > wrote: >> I don't buy that... Respect your opinion but I don't buy that 63 list... >> I have no confidence in Trump... I think he is bad for our country... I will >> not >> change my mind. If you want to knock me off list... It's cool... I have >> always >> remained true to my beliefs. My last post on this one... >> On Jan 22, 2017 3:50 PM, "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > wrote: >>> Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were involved in some >>> way >>> with the JFK assassination? >>> On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" < ch...@wbmfg.com > wrote: >>>> One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63 people are as >>>> dead >>>> as you can get and all of them either spilled the beans on the Clintons or >>>> had >>>> information that could harm the Clintons. >>>> So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not yet heard of >>>> anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better at doing it. >>>> 1. Susan Coleman: >>>> 2. Larry Guerrin: >>>> 3. Kevin Ives >>>> 4. Don Henry: >>>> 5. Keith Coney: >>>> 6. Keith McKaskle: >>>> 7. Gregory Collins: >>>> 8. Jeff Rhodes: >>>> 9. James Milam: >>>> 10. Richard Winters: >>>> 11. Jordan Kettleson: >>>> 12. Alan Standorf: >>>> 13. Dennis Eisman: . >>>> 14. Danny Casalaro: >>>> 15. Victor Raiser: >>>> 16. R. Montgomery Raiser: >>>> 17. Paul Tully: >>>> 18. Ian Spiro: >>>> 19. Paula Gober: >>>> 20. Jim Wilhite: >>>> 21. Steve Willis, >>>> 22. Robert Williams, >>>> 23. Todd McKeahan >>>> 24. Conway LeBleu: >>>> 25. Sgt. Brian Haney, >>>> 26. Sgt. Tim Sabel, >>>> 27. Maj. William Barkley, >>>> 28. Capt. Scott Reynolds: >>>> 29. John Crawford: >>>> 30. John Wilson: >>>> 31. Paul Wilcher: >>>> 32. Vincent Foster: >>>> 33. Jon Parnell Walker: >>>> 34. Stanley Heard >>>> 35. Steven Dickson: >>>> 36. Jerry Luther Parks: >>>> 37. Ed Willey: >>>> 38. Gandy Baugh: >>>> 39. Herschell Friday: >>>> 40. Ronald Rogers: >>>> 41. Kathy Furguson: >>>> 42. Bill Shelton: >>>> 43. Stanley Huggins: >>>> 44. Paul Olson: >>>> 45. Calvin Walraven: >>>> 46. Alan G. Whicher: >>>> 47. Duane Garrett: >>>> 48. Ron Brown:. >>>> 49. Charles Meissner: >>>> 50. William Colby: >>>> 51. Admiral Jeremy Boorda: >>>> 52. Lance Herndon: >>>> 53. Neil Moody: >>>> 54. Barbara Wise: >>>> 55. Doug Adams: >>>> 56. Mary C. Mahoney: >>>> 57. Ronald Miller: >>>> 58. Sandy Hume: >>>> 59. Jim McDougal: >>>> 60. Johnny Lawhon: >>>> 61. Charles Wilbourne Miller: >>>> 62. Carlos Ghigliotti: >>>> 63. Tony Moser: >>>> From: Josh Reynolds >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>> He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. Some were >>>> legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your right. >>>> I do >>>> not. >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" < jon-ispli...@michwave.net > >>>> wrote: >>>> He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions. >>>> Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly >>>> 'spenders' >>>> Jon Langeler >>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > wrote: >>>> Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often >>>> happens >>>> by accident, or in spite of intelligence. >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" < jon-ispli...@michwave.net > >>>> wrote: >>>> Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if your >>>> looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. >>>> Jon Langeler >>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza < losguyswirel...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: >>>> Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... Waiting >>>> for >>>> right time to do it comrades >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > wrote: >>>> https://streamable.com/md28v >>>> I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not >>>> some >>>> kind of joke taken too far... >>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza < losguyswirel...@gmail.com >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. >>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" < losguyswirel...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: >>>> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. The >>>> bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >>>> inauguration.... >>>> Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let me Trumpspeak... So >>>> sad. >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: >>>> there is this gem now >>>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt < s...@genias.net > >>>> wrote: >>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very difficult >>>> to get >>>> the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very biased even >>>> here >>>> over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is biased, too. >>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it was >>>> clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable >>>> here. It >>>> would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and would make >>>> him >>>> unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion away from this >>>> fact >>>> and relativated his guilty to make him votable. >>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which is >>>> minor >>>> at best but was discussed the whole time. >>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >>>> media >>>> helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem than >>>> starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >>>> reasons why >>>> this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure you >>>> have a >>>> problem. >>>> Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>>> An: af@afmug.com >>>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to effectively >>>> shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current environment. >>>> Between >>>> press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses, live streamed >>>> events, >>>> and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press really is the >>>> dialup >>>> internet method of getting information. We know more in real time then the >>>> press could ever package up and present. The current mindset of media in >>>> press >>>> conferences is that of militants (both sides of the media isle) and there >>>> is >>>> zero professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the >>>> answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever their preconceived >>>> response >>>> was either way. >>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>>> Answer: Yes >>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 ISIS >>>> fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who >>>> would >>>> commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the transition of >>>> power. >>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >>>> before >>>> leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous time of >>>> transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >>>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top military >>>> officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify there were >>>> no >>>> civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime charges >>>> possible? >>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 >>>> ISIS top >>>> leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS surrender. >>>> Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy < jeremysmi...@gmail.com > wrote: >>>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by the >>>> first >>>> white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an amazing >>>> public >>>> speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's uncle or >>>> something >>>> who did too much meth? You know how they start out with one sentence and >>>> then >>>> before you know it they have told fifteen other stories before they ever >>>> get to >>>> the point...if they ever do??? We have four years of that to look forward >>>> to. >>>> Just watch the full speech at the CIA, you will see what I mean. Or >>>> don't....save yourself the pain. >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > >>>> wrote: >>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>>> as part >>>> of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>>> as part >>>> of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part > of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
